- 8017 Labana Ct, Canton Township, MI 48187
- +1 (734) 418 2537
- info@a2zbillings.com
Practices running E-Tech already have a capable EHR underneath them. A2Z Billings sits inside that system and runs the parts of the revenue cycle a chart can't finish on its own: eligibility checks, specialty-matched coding, first-submission accuracy, payment posting, and follow-up on every account that starts to age.
E-Tech is built to document care, not argue with payers. It generates the encounter, carries the codes a provider enters, and pushes a claim out the door. What happens next (whether a payer honors those codes, whether a modifier survives a bundling edit, whether a denial is worth fighting) sits outside what any EHR is designed to decide.
A2Z Billings isn’t affiliated with E-Tech and doesn’t build or sell the software. We work as an outside billing team inside whatever EHR a practice already runs, and E-Tech happens to be one of them.
E-Tech's built-in scrubber checks formatting, not payer-specific edits. A claim can clear every internal flag and still bounce on a bundling rule the software was never built to check.
Telehealth visits need a place-of-service and modifier combination that shifts by payer and by state. Left on the encounter's default, a claim underpays without ever denying outright.
Auto-posting is fast, but it accepts whatever the remit says. A contractual adjustment coded wrong by a payer posts clean and quiet, and the shortfall goes unnoticed unless someone checks it against the fee schedule.
The authorization existed. It just didn't cover the code that ended up on the claim after a plan changed mid-visit. E-Tech has no way to catch that mismatch on its own.
The same denial reason on five claims rarely means the same problem. Tracing each one back to registration, coding, or a payer policy shift is what actually stops the code from recurring.
A claim inside E-Tech passes through this many checkpoints between the visit and the deposit. Our workflow is built to cover every one, not just the ones the software already handles on its own.
Demographics and insurance captured before the visit is even scheduled.
Coverage and benefit level confirmed against the payer, not assumed from last visit.
Referrals and pre-certs logged against the specific service planned, ahead of the date of service.
Every billable service on the encounter reconciled against the schedule, not just what got typed in.
Codes assigned by specialty and checked against current payer edits.
A second pass beyond E-Tech's default scrubber, built around payer-specific rules.
Clearinghouse acknowledgment confirmed for every claim, not only the ones that error out.
Rejections worked the same day so a claim doesn't sit past a timely-filing window.
Remits posted and checked line by line against the contracted rate, not just the total.
Denials sorted by reason and routed to whoever can actually fix that reason.
Aging buckets worked on a set schedule instead of oldest-balance-first.
Patient responsibility billed only once the payer side is fully resolved.
Denial and A/R trends reported back in terms a practice can act on, not raw exports.
One coder learns your specialty and payer mix instead of rotating through a general pool.
A cardiology claim and a behavioral health claim don't get the same eye. Ours don't either.
We review 90 days of your E-Tech claims data and show you where money is sitting before you sign anything.
Contract length and applicable regulations are customized to the practice needs.
No. We work inside E-Tech as it's already set up, with no migration and no new login for your staff.
Directly through E-Tech. Your claims, remits, and reports stay inside the system you already use.
Most practices hand off within a week. We shadow the existing workflow first so nothing gets dropped mid-transition.
Under a signed BAA, with access limited to the staff working your account inside E-Tech's existing permission structure.
By checking claims against payer-specific edits before submission, not just E-Tech's default scrubber.
Just EDI, ERA, and EFT enrollment if it isn't active already. We handle that setup.
Yes, including re-validation, so a lapsed enrollment doesn't turn into a stretch of unpaid claims.
A flat percentage of what we actually collect. No collections, no fee.
